3/5/08

Paideia

Anthony Wachs


Paideia is a rich word that originally meant child rearing.[1] Eventually, it was “connected with the highest areté possible to man: it was used to denote the sum-total of all ideal perfections of mind and body.”[2] Paideia is used, and weakly translated in its broadest sense, to mean “civilization, culture, tradition, literature, or education. But none of them really covers what the Greeks meant by paideia.”[3] Plato defines the essence of “all true culture, or paideia…as ‘the education in areté from youth onwards, which makes men passionately desire to become perfect citizens, knowing both how to rule and to be ruled on a basis of justice’.”[4] In other words, “The nearest equivalent to our concept of culture in the Greek world is the word paideia—education in the highest sense, which guides a human being to genuine humanity. In Latin the same idea is expressed in the in the word erudition: a man is freed from roughness [ex + rudis] and is trained in true manliness.”[5]

Rhetoricians today can learn from the Greek understanding of paedeia. Before we can create a true/good paideia we must first have an idea of what genuine humanity is.[6] We must ask ourselves: “Are religious skepticism and indifference, and moral and metaphysical ‘relativism’, which Plato opposed so bitterly and which made him a fierce and lifelong opponent of the sophists, essential elements of humanism?”[7] If the answer to this question is no, then we must ask ourselves why these have become essential elements of our discipline’s paideia. If the answer is yes, then current paideia of indifferentism and relativism should be applauded and nourished. Essentially, before we ourselves are paideia[8] and create paideia we must first engage in philosophy. “To put it in Platonic terms, everything depends on man’s ability to tell the real good from the mere appearance of good, the true from the false.”[9] Philosophy must guide our paideia, not vice versa.[10] “The experience of the past century, with its heavy toll of war and violence, culminating in the planned extermination of whole peoples”[11] provides insight into the results of paideia guiding philosophy.

Bibliography

Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to H.E. Mary Ann Glendon New Ambassador of the

United States of America to the Holy See, given Friday, February 29th 2008.

Isocrates I. David C. Mirhady & Yun Lee Too, Trans. Austin: U of Texas P, 2000.

Jaeger, Werner. Paideia:The Ideals of Greek Culture. v1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1939.

________. Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Cambridge, MA.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1961.

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. On the Way to Jesus Christ. Trans. Miller, Michael J. San Francisco Ignatius Press, 2004.

Walker, Jeffery. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.



[1] Jaeger, Werner. Paideia:The Ideals of Greek Culture. v1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1939, p. 5, 286.

[2] Ibid., 286.

[3] Ibid., v.

[4] Ibid., 113.

[5] Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. On the Way to Jesus Christ. Trans. Miller, Michael J. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004, p. 44.

[6] To not do so would be extremely irresponsible. It would be like attempting constructing a chair without knowing what a chair is; the chances of actually building a chair in this manner are beyond slim.

[7] Jaeger, 1939, 301.

[8] Paideia also refers to the quality or character of being educated.

[9] Jaeger, Werner. Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Cambridge, MA.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1961, p. 65.

[10] For Isocrates, and the other sophists for that matter, philosophy and truth are products of hē tōn logōn paideia (culture of discourse). The education that Isocrates offers at his school is called logôn paideia (discourse education) (Walker, 29).

[11] Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI to H.E. Mary Ann Glendon New Ambassador of the United States of America to the Holy See, given Friday, February 29th 2008.

4 comments:

Michael Trynosky said...

Let me see if I understand this right. Paideia means roughly culture. Paideia is all culmination of culture. Thus before we can say our culture is the best we need to start from the beginning and attempt to discover what is truly the best culture?

Anthony M Wachs said...

Pretty much. We need recourse to what best is before we can make any sort of judgement. A better starting spot would probably be what is the purpose of life. Answer that and you my friend will sell books and probably be able to make a judgment on what good culture is.

Anonymous said...

Anthony,

I don't find it surprising that your post ends with a call to seek "genuine humanity" but I am somewhat troubled by the use of paideia to get there.

While I don't want to rehash Big T versus Little t discussion, it seems to me that privileging justice and education does present interesting ethical issues. For example, at what point do we deem ourselves 'just' enough or 'educated' enough to teach others? What is philosophy if oriented towards the universal? Today, questioning the form that education and justice take is important rhetorically. After all, education policies like No Child Left Behind have been advocated, passed and supported at the expense of alternative plans, even though such policies have had a mixed (and sometimes negative) effect on the educational achievement of schools. See http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2006/03/07/67498

Same thing goes with justice - I mean, Bush made the Iraq War all about justice by claiming he was 'bringing Saddam to justice.' See (http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/05/01/sprj.irq.bush.speech/index.html)

But like you say, even before we collapse into the Big T Little t debate, it would seem prudent to engage in philosophy. SO I guess I agree with you - if paideia is truly about seeking a universal humanity, then perhaps education can create some level of awareness of these rhetorical situations in which the concepts of education and justice are devalued.

Anthony M Wachs said...

Max,
If I catch what you are saying I agree with you. The form of education should be questioned. Our current system is based on John Dewey's thought it totally messed up. I recently have came across a couple programs based off of the great books "series." At St. Thomas Aquinas College in California there are no text books only the great books running from Plato to Nietzsche, from Homer to T.S. Eliot; there are no teachers, only a "tutor of sorts" that helps to guide discussion.

I also agree about what you are saying about justice. I think that we would both agree that from the outset our whole "quest" to go into Iraq was unjust. Pre-emptive strike? First of all I think we wouldn't be in the situation if our society had been educated before hand to think critically. Second, I believe that we have access to some authorities, great minds and theories of the past, to act from i.e., just war theory by Augustine.

I believe we have tended to agree on issues like this because we have tried to transcend our paideia though we differ in our metaphysics i.e., our first principles.